Fair, clear and not misleading: what the FCA rule means, with examples
Fair, clear and not misleading is the FCA's core promotions standard (COBS 4.2.1R for investments, CONC 3.3.1R for credit). A promotion must be accurate, balance benefits with risks and be likely to be understood by its audience.

In short
- The standard is a rule in every FCA sourcebook that governs promotions: COBS 4.2.1R for investments, CONC 3.3.1R for credit, BCOBS 2.2.1R for banking and payments, ICOBS 2.2.2R for insurance, MCOB 3A.2.4R for mortgages, CMCOB 3.2.1R for claims management and FPCOB 4.2.1R for funeral plans.
- It covers promotions a firm approves for others as well as its own (COBS 4.2.1R(2)(c)), and communications to professional clients, in proportion to what they need (COBS 4.2.2G).
- In investment promotions, any mention of a benefit needs a fair and prominent indication of the relevant risks, in a font at least equal to the predominant font size (COBS 4.5.2R for retail clients; COBS 4.5A.3R for MiFID business).
- Use “guaranteed”, “protected” or “secure” only where the word is a fair description and the promotion gives everything needed to make it so (COBS 4.2.5G).
- For retail customers, the Consumer Duty adds a test of understanding: communications must be likely to be understood, and firms must test them where appropriate (PRIN 2A.5.3R and PRIN 2A.5.10R).
- Since 31 May 2024, any reference to the sustainability characteristics of a product or service must be consistent with them and fair, clear and not misleading (ESG 4.3.1R).
What does fair, clear and not misleading mean?
It is the FCA's basic standard for what a firm tells its customers, including the financial promotions it communicates or approves. For investments, the rule is COBS 4.2.1R: “A firm must ensure that a communication or a financial promotion is fair, clear and not misleading.”
The rule does not define the three words. The credit version sets out what they require:
A firm must ensure that each communication and each financial promotion: (a) is clearly identifiable as such; (b) is accurate; (c) is balanced and, in particular, does not emphasise any potential benefits of a product or service without also giving a fair and prominent indication of any relevant risks; (d) is sufficient for, and presented in a way that is likely to be understood by, the average member of the group to which it is directed, or by which it is likely to be received; and (e) does not disguise, omit, diminish or obscure important information, statements or warnings.
COBS sets similar conditions for investments (COBS 4.5.2R; COBS 4.5A.3R for MiFID business). Two more points shape how they apply:
- The medium. The rule applies “in a way that is appropriate and proportionate taking into account the means of communication” and what it is meant to convey (COBS 4.2.2G, guidance).
- What is left out. True statements can still mislead. The FCA asks firms to “consider whether omission of any relevant fact will result in the information being insufficient, unclear, unfair or misleading” (COBS 4.5A.6G, guidance).
Where the rule sits in each FCA sourcebook
Each of these sourcebooks has its own version. All are rules; most require the firm to ensure the result, some only to take reasonable steps.
| What is promoted | Provision | Force |
|---|---|---|
| Investments, including pensions and CFDs | COBS 4.2.1R | Rule: must ensure |
| Consumer credit, debt counselling and debt adjusting | CONC 3.3.1R | Rule: must ensure |
| Deposits, payment services and e-money | BCOBS 2.2.1R | Rule: must take reasonable steps |
| General and pure protection insurance | ICOBS 2.2.2R | Rule: must ensure, though reasonable steps suffice in some cases (ICOBS 2.2.5R) |
| Mortgages and other home finance | MCOB 3A.2.4R | Rule: must ensure for MCD regulated mortgages; must be able to show reasonable steps for non-real time promotions of other qualifying credit, home reversion plans and sale and rent back, and take reasonable steps when approving a home purchase plan promotion (MCOB 3A.2.5R) |
| Claims management | CMCOB 3.2.1R | Rule: must ensure |
| Funeral plans | FPCOB 4.2.1R | Rule: must ensure |
| Sustainability claims about any product or service | ESG 4.3.1R | Rule: must ensure |
| Any product, to retail customers | PRIN 2A.5.3R(2), the Consumer Duty | Rule |
| Any product, to clients outside the Consumer Duty | PRIN 2.1.1R, Principle 7 | Rule (a Principle) |
The phrase also governs consumer composite investment product summaries (DISC 3.1.2R(2), from 6 April 2026) and pensions dashboard services (PDCOB 4.2.1R). Principle 7, the Consumer Duty, CONC and ICOBS say “clear, fair”, COBS “fair, clear”; the FCA uses both orders for the same requirement (CMCOB 3.1.2G). In April 2026 the FCA consulted on removing provisions in CONC 3 “which may be overly prescriptive or outdated” (CP26/15); for now, CONC 3 applies as it stands. Our guide to consumer credit promotion rules covers the rest of it.
Principle 7 requires a firm to “pay due regard to the information needs of its clients, and communicate information to them in a way which is clear, fair and not misleading”. To the extent the Consumer Duty applies, Principle 7 does not (PRIN 3.2.10R), and the Duty carries the same words for retail customers. Principle 7 still covers, for example, services to professional clients (PRIN 3.2.11G).
Who has to meet the standard
COBS 4.2.1R(2) applies to a firm's communications to customers about designated investment business, MiFID or not, and to eligible counterparties about MiFID business or insurance distribution; to the financial promotions it communicates, other than excluded communications, non-retail communications and third party prospectuses; and to “a financial promotion approved by the firm”. Promotions to professional clients are covered, though they “may not need to include the same information, or be presented in the same way” as those to retail clients (COBS 4.2.2G).
An unauthorised business, such as an introducer or influencer, needs an authorised firm's approval or an exemption to communicate a financial promotion in the course of business (FSMA section 21). The approver must confirm compliance first, applying the rules for business other than MiFID business (COBS 4.10.2R(1) and (3); see the approval process).
For MiFID business, the requirement comes from article 24(3) of MiFID II: “All information, including marketing communications, addressed by the investment firm to clients or potential clients shall be fair, clear and not misleading.” COBS 4.2.1R's notes cite it. In the EU, article 44 of Delegated Regulation 2017/565 sets the detail (CySEC's marketing rules show it in use).
How COBS spells it out for investments
The FCA's guidance in COBS 4.2 says what an investment promotion should do:
A firm should ensure that a financial promotion: (1) for a product or service that places a client's capital at risk makes this clear; (2) that quotes a yield figure gives a balanced impression of both the short and long term prospects for the investment; (3) that promotes an investment or service whose charging structure is complex, or in relation to which the firm will receive more than one element of remuneration, includes the information necessary to ensure that it is fair, clear and not misleading and contains sufficient information taking into account the needs of the recipients;
COBS 4.2.5G adds that “guaranteed”, “protected”, “secure” or a similar term should be used only where it “is capable of being a fair, clear and not misleading description” and the firm gives all the information needed to make it so. The detailed conditions depend on whether the business is MiFID business:
| Requirement | Non-MiFID business | MiFID business |
|---|---|---|
| Who is protected | Retail clients (COBS 4.5.1R) | Retail and professional clients (COBS 4.5A.3R(1)) |
| Benefits balanced by a fair and prominent indication of relevant risks | COBS 4.5.2R(2) | COBS 4.5A.3R(2)(b) |
| Risk text at least the predominant font size, in a prominent layout | COBS 4.5.2R(5) | COBS 4.5A.3R(2)(c) |
| Likely to be understood by the average recipient | COBS 4.5.2R(3) | COBS 4.5A.3R(2)(d) |
| Comparisons | Meaningful, fair and balanced (COBS 4.5.6R) | Also with sources, key facts and assumptions (COBS 4.5A.7R) |
| Past performance | COBS 4.6.2R | COBS 4.5A.10R |
| Future performance | COBS 4.6.7R | COBS 4.5A.14R |
In brief, past performance must not be the most prominent feature, must cover the preceding five years (or the whole period, if shorter) in complete 12-month periods, and needs a prominent warning “that the figures refer to the past and that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results”. A forecast for a financial instrument needs “reasonable assumptions supported by objective data”, positive and negative scenarios and a warning. The FCA plans to consult in early 2027 on risk information for mainstream investments (FS26/3, 16 October 2026).
How the Consumer Duty raises the bar
For retail customers, the Consumer Duty keeps the standard and adds a test of understanding. PRIN 2A.5.3R requires communications that “are likely to be understood by retail customers” and “equip retail customers to make decisions that are effective, timely and properly informed”. It applies to promotions addressed to, or likely to be received by, a retail customer (PRIN 3.2.6R).
The Consumer Duty builds on and goes further than the core requirement for communications to be fair, clear and not misleading.
Firms must tailor communications to their customers' characteristics, including vulnerability (PRIN 2A.5.8R), and, where appropriate, test them before use and monitor them afterwards (PRIN 2A.5.10R). In March 2026 the FCA found that “Many firms relied only on compliance checks or sales data, without checking that customers understood the promotion” (FCA, 13 March 2026).
Sustainability claims: the anti-greenwashing rule
A firm must ensure that any reference to the sustainability characteristics of a product or service is: (a) consistent with the sustainability characteristics of the product or service; and (b) fair, clear and not misleading.
It applies to a firm “whether it is undertaking sustainability in-scope business or not”, when it communicates with UK clients about a product or service or communicates or approves a promotion for people in the UK (ESG 4.3.1R(1)). It has applied since 31 May 2024 (FG24/3, response to question 3).
The FCA's guidance, which “does not create new obligations” (FG24/3, paragraph 1.14), says sustainability references should be “[c]orrect and capable of being substantiated”, clear, complete and, where they compare, “fair and meaningful” (paragraph 2.17). Sustainability claims a firm makes about itself, rather than about a product or service, are covered by Principles 6 and 7 or the Consumer Duty, and by the CMA's and ASA's guidance (paragraph 2.15).
Claims that fail the standard, and how to fix them
Why each of these claims can fail, and the fix, with the provision behind it:
| The claim | Why it fails, and the fix |
|---|---|
| “Guaranteed”, “protected”, “secure” or “risk-free” | Only where the word is a fair description and the promotion gives, clearly and prominently, everything needed to make it so. If capital is at risk, say so.COBS 4.2.5G; COBS 4.2.4G(1); BCOBS 2.2.5G |
| A return or yield with no risk beside it | Give a fair and prominent indication of the relevant risks beside the benefit. Yields should give a balanced impression of short and long-term prospects; forecasts need objective data, scenarios and a warning.COBS 4.5.2R(2); COBS 4.2.4G(2); COBS 4.6.7R |
| “Free” or “interest free” | Say exactly what is free and what is charged. A credit promotion must not say “interest free” unless the total amount payable does not exceed the cash price.CONC 3.5.12R(1)(b); COBS 4.2.4G(3) |
| “No fees” when the cost is in the exchange rate | Show the markup as a cost. The FCA's own example is below.FCA, 1 May 2025 |
| “Low risk” or “safe” | Only if accurate for this product and audience. Say what the risk is low compared with, and what could still be lost.COBS 4.5.2R(2); COBS 4.2.4G(1) |
| “Beats cash” or “cheaper than the banks” | Compare like with like, meaningfully and in a fair and balanced way. For MiFID business, name the sources and give the key facts and assumptions.COBS 4.5.6R; COBS 4.5A.7R; CONC 3.3.1R(1B) |
| Risks in small print, a caption or the last screen | Give risk text at least the predominant font size and a prominent place. The FCA has found warnings “placed at the end of long mobile journeys or displayed in small or low contrast formats”.COBS 4.5.2R(5); COBS 4.5A.3R(2)(c); FG24/1, paragraph 2.27; FCA, 13 March 2026 |
| Charges left to the terms and conditions | Explain complex charges in the promotion itself. The FCA reported in October 2026 that the CFD firms it reviewed “do not explain their costs prominently enough in the client journey”.COBS 4.2.4G(3); FCA, 15 October 2026 |
| A headline rate or saving most people will not get | Say that it depends on checks or circumstances. Insurance pricing claims should match what most people who respond can expect, or state prominently the proportion likely to achieve them.FCA, 13 March 2026; ICOBS 2.2.4G; BCOBS 2.2.5AG |
| Testimonials and case studies | Use only genuine ones you can evidence. False testimonials are on the FCA's list of practices likely to breach the credit rule.CONC 3.3.10G(4); CAP 3.47 |
| “Best”, “No. 1” or “award-winning” | Hold the evidence before publishing, and say whose award and when. Unsubstantiated claims to size, experience or pre-eminence are on the same list.CONC 3.3.10G(5); CAP 3.7 |
| One strong year of past performance | Show five years, or the whole period if shorter, in complete 12-month periods, with the period, the source and the warning, and not as the most prominent feature.COBS 4.6.2R; COBS 4.5A.10R |
The FCA's own example: £100 sent at a firm rate of 1.26 US dollars to the pound, against a reference rate of 1.30.
A fixed fee of £0.00 and the note “There is no fee for this transaction”. The markup in the rate is not shown as a cost.
The same rate and fixed fee, plus total fees of £3.00 and the note “Our exchange rate includes a 3% markup charge.”
The FCA lists “Highlighting the absence of a fixed fee as a ‘zero cost transaction’ despite charging a markup” as poor practice. It adds that such examples may not in themselves mean a firm is failing its duties, but show where it should consider improvements.
Where advertising law overlaps: the CAP Code and the DMCC Act
The CAP Code, enforced by the Advertising Standards Authority, says: “Marketing communications must not materially mislead or be likely to do so” (CAP 3.1). The CAP Code's financial rules in section 14 apply only to adverts the FCA does not regulate and to debt advice, but every financial advert stays subject to its rules on non-technical elements, including “the truthfulness of claims that do not relate to specific characteristics of financial products” (CAP Code, section 14, background). The FCA has told cryptoasset firms that the standards its financial promotion rules require are “significantly more detailed” than the ASA's (FCA, 7 September 2023).
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024. Its unfair trading rules came into force on 6 April 2025 (S.I. 2025/272, regulation 2), replacing the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. Unfair commercial practices are prohibited (section 225). Misleading information includes information which, “although true, is presented in a misleading way” (section 226(2)), and omitting information includes giving it “in such a way that the consumer is unlikely to see it” (section 227(4)). Misleading actions and omissions can be criminal offences (section 237), and the Competition and Markets Authority can impose penalties of up to £300,000 or, if higher, 10% of turnover (section 182(6)).
A checklist to test a promotion against the standard
These checks test the standard itself; the financial promotions checklist covers the rest of a review.
- The right rule. Which sourcebook applies, and is the firm communicating the promotion or approving it?
- The audience. Would the average person it reaches understand it on this channel?
- Accuracy. Is every fact correct, with the evidence on file before publication?
- Balance. Does every benefit come with a fair and prominent indication of the relevant risks, in at least the predominant font size?
- Capital at risk. If money can be lost, does it say so, with no “guaranteed” or “risk-free” unless that is fair?
- Costs and headline figures. Are all charges, including markups, shown, and would most people get the rate or saving advertised?
- Comparisons, performance and endorsements. Like for like and sourced; five complete years with the warning; testimonials and “best” claims evidenced?
- Sustainability. Is every green claim consistent with the product and substantiated?
- The overall impression. Is the whole accurate, with nothing important left to a caption, a link or the small print?
- Understanding. For retail customers, has it been tested where appropriate, and who monitors it once live?
Connor reads a promotion (an image, video, PDF, web page or social post) and works out which rules apply from the firm's home regulator, the markets it targets and the products it promotes. It lists each problem with the rule it breaks and the fix, quoting the words each finding is about and linking to the regulator's text where one is published. A person at the firm makes the decision, and Connor keeps the record.
Questions people ask
What does fair, clear and not misleading mean?
It is the FCA's basic standard for communications and financial promotions. The rules do not define the three words, but they set out what they require: a promotion must be accurate, balance any benefit with a fair and prominent indication of the relevant risks, be likely to be understood by the average person it reaches and not disguise, omit, diminish or obscure important information (CONC 3.3.1R(1A); COBS 4.5.2R).
Is fair, clear and not misleading a principle or a rule?
Both. Principle 7 requires firms to communicate information to clients in a way which is “clear, fair and not misleading” (PRIN 2.1.1R), and each conduct sourcebook has its own rule, such as COBS 4.2.1R for investments and CONC 3.3.1R for credit. Where the Consumer Duty applies, Principle 7 does not (PRIN 3.2.10R); the Duty carries the same requirement for retail customers (PRIN 2A.5.3R(2)).
Does fair, clear and not misleading apply to professional clients?
Yes. The FCA's guidance says a communication to a professional client that is also a financial promotion will still be subject to the fair, clear and not misleading rule, although it may not need the same information, presented in the same way, as one to a retail client (COBS 4.2.2G). For MiFID business, COBS 4.5A.3R applies its detailed conditions to information for retail and professional clients.
Where does fair, clear and not misleading come from in MiFID?
Article 24(3) of MiFID II: “All information, including marketing communications, addressed by the investment firm to clients or potential clients shall be fair, clear and not misleading.” In the UK the requirement sits in COBS 4.2.1R, whose notes cite article 24(3), with the detailed conditions for MiFID business in COBS 4.5A.
Can a promotion be misleading if everything in it is true?
Yes. The FCA's guidance asks firms to consider whether leaving out a relevant fact will make information “insufficient, unclear, unfair or misleading” (COBS 4.5A.6G). Consumer law takes the same view: under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, misleading information includes information which, “although true, is presented in a misleading way” (section 226(2)).
Sources
49 sources, read on
- COBS 4.2.1R: the fair, clear and not misleading ruleRule
- CONC 3.3.1R: clear, fair and not misleading, consumer creditRule
- COBS 4.5.2R: information to retail clientsRule
- COBS 4.5A.3R: information to clients, MiFID businessRule
- COBS 4.2.2G: how the rule appliesGuidance
- COBS 4.5A.6G: omitting relevant factsGuidance
- BCOBS 2.2.1R: banking, payments and e-moneyRule
- ICOBS 2.2: insurance communications and approvalsRule · ICOBS 2.2.2R; guidance at 2.2.4G
- MCOB 3A.2.4R: mortgage and home finance promotionsRule
- CMCOB 3.2.1R: claims managementRule
- FPCOB 4.2.1R: funeral plansRule
- ESG 4.3.1R: the anti-greenwashing ruleRule
- PRIN 2A.5: Consumer Duty, consumer understandingRule · PRIN 2A.5.3R, 2A.5.8R and 2A.5.10R
- PRIN 2.1.1R: the Principles for BusinessesRule · Principle 7
- DISC 3.1.2R: consumer composite investment product summariesRule · In force from 6 April 2026
- PDCOB 4.2.1R: pensions dashboard communicationsRule
- CMCOB 3.1.2G: the Consumer Duty and claims management communicationsGuidance
- CP26/15: Reviewing the financial promotions rules for consumer creditPublication · 29 April 2026; consultation closed 17 June 2026
- PRIN 3.2.10R: Principles 6 and 7 and the Consumer DutyRule
- PRIN 3.2.11G: where Principles 6 and 7 still applyGuidance
- COBS 4.2.6R: the reasonable steps defenceRule
- Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 138DLegislation · Actions for damages
- Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 21Legislation
- COBS 4.10.2R: approving financial promotionsRule
- MiFID II, Article 24Legislation
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565, Article 44Legislation
- COBS 4.2.4G: fair, clear and not misleading financial promotionsGuidance
- COBS 4.2.5G: “guaranteed”, “protected” and “secure”Guidance
- COBS 4.5: communicating with retail clients, non-MiFIDRule · COBS 4.5.1R, 4.5.2R and 4.5.6R
- COBS 4.5A: communicating with clients, MiFID businessRule · COBS 4.5A.3R, 4.5A.7R, 4.5A.10R and 4.5A.14R
- COBS 4.6: past and future performance, non-MiFIDRule · COBS 4.6.2R and 4.6.7R
- FS26/3: Expanding consumer access to investmentsPublication · 16 October 2026
- PRIN 3.2.6R: when the Consumer Duty applies to promotionsRule
- FG24/1: financial promotions on social mediaGuidance · 26 March 2024
- Consumer understanding: good practice and areas for improvementPublication · 13 March 2026
- FG24/3: Finalised non-handbook guidance on the anti-greenwashing ruleGuidance · 23 April 2024
- CONC 3.5.12R: restricted expressionsRule
- BCOBS 2.2.5G and 2.2.5AG: “guaranteed” and exchange ratesGuidance
- Consumer Duty: International payment pricing transparency, good and poor practicePublication · 1 May 2025
- Contracts for difference firms: good and poor practicePublication · 15 October 2026
- CONC 3.3.10G: practices likely to breach the ruleGuidance
- CAP Code, section 3: misleading advertisingRule · Rules 3.1, 3.7, 3.9 and 3.47; Advertising Standards Authority
- CAP Code, section 14: financial productsRule · Advertising Standards Authority
- Firms' preparations to comply with the cryptoasset financial promotions regimePublication · 7 September 2023
- Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (Commencement No. 2) Regulations 2025, regulation 2Legislation · S.I. 2025/272
- Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, regulation 3Legislation · Revoked from 6 April 2025
- Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, sections 225 to 227Legislation · Unfair commercial practices, misleading actions and omissions
- Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, section 237Legislation · Offences
- Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, section 182Legislation · Final infringement notice
This page explains the rules; it is not legal advice. Rules change: read the provision itself before relying on it. If you find an error, email hi@runconnor.com and we will correct it.





